<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Amtech NC-559 Flux &#8211; Fake Versus Real	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.microsoldering.com/amtech-nc-559-flux-fake-versus-real/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.microsoldering.com/amtech-nc-559-flux-fake-versus-real/</link>
	<description>Microscopic Board Level Repair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2018 22:41:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Majenko		</title>
		<link>https://www.microsoldering.com/amtech-nc-559-flux-fake-versus-real/#comment-6392</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Majenko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2018 22:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microsoldering.com/?p=124#comment-6392</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have some &quot;scamtech&quot; flux. It wasn&#039;t sold as Amtech, but when it arrived it had Amtech on the label. Which was a surprise. However it was obviously fake, because:

&quot;A Dlvlsion [sic] of AMT Advanced Metals Inc&quot;

and

&quot;Warning: May contain lead. This product contains chemicals known to the state of Colifornia [sic] and other states to canuse [sic] cancer,birth [sic] defects or other reproductive ham [sic]. Consuit [sic] MSDS.For industrial use only. Not for resale,unauthorized [sic] distribution or personal use.&quot;

Still, it seems to work for me, and as I don&#039;t use high temperatures (I&#039;m a low-temperature paste user) it works well enough. And it&#039;s better than Chipquik...  and $1.75 for three 10cc tubes I wasn&#039;t expecting anything wonderful...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some &#8220;scamtech&#8221; flux. It wasn&#8217;t sold as Amtech, but when it arrived it had Amtech on the label. Which was a surprise. However it was obviously fake, because:</p>
<p>&#8220;A Dlvlsion [sic] of AMT Advanced Metals Inc&#8221;</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>&#8220;Warning: May contain lead. This product contains chemicals known to the state of Colifornia [sic] and other states to canuse [sic] cancer,birth [sic] defects or other reproductive ham [sic]. Consuit [sic] MSDS.For industrial use only. Not for resale,unauthorized [sic] distribution or personal use.&#8221;</p>
<p>Still, it seems to work for me, and as I don&#8217;t use high temperatures (I&#8217;m a low-temperature paste user) it works well enough. And it&#8217;s better than Chipquik&#8230;  and $1.75 for three 10cc tubes I wasn&#8217;t expecting anything wonderful&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bzzz		</title>
		<link>https://www.microsoldering.com/amtech-nc-559-flux-fake-versus-real/#comment-1259</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bzzz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2018 11:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microsoldering.com/?p=124#comment-1259</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Images are kinda broken ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Images are kinda broken 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
